Ward 3

Get the app
Voting district 65910034: ANC 55.6% (PR ballot)Voting district 65910056: ANC 32.2% (PR ballot)Carel van Zyl Primary School (VD 65910034)Karoo Sky Holdings 1 (VD 65910056)
Voting districtsANC 2darker = bigger win
Dots: voting stations
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC 37.1%up 1.2 pts from 35.9% in 2021

African National Congress · won the ward ballot

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

This wardAll 2 voting districts in
Turnout58.6%
Voters on the roll1 670
South Africa · Counting19 039 of 23 696 voting districts in (80.3%)
checked Latest results

Elected ward councillor ?

Johannes Solomon NewathAfrican National Congress

Ward ballot ? · 951 valid votes

  1. ANCAfrican National Congress35337.1%
  2. EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters27428.8%
  3. DADemocratic Alliance15516.3%
  4. PAPatriotic Alliance869.0%
  5. KCMKareeberg Civic Movement737.7%
  6. VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus101.1%

Hours off in Ward 3 ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages

Voting districts · 2 ?

Candidates · 6

  • Johannes Solomon NewathAfrican National Congress
  • Albertus Petrus Fakelyn van SchalkwykDemocratic Alliance
  • Wilfret Daniël HorneEconomic Freedom Fighters
  • Johannes MaritzKareeberg Civic Movement
  • Siwiza Jenera ShilubanaPatriotic Alliance
  • Pieter Nicholaas BothaVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus

Source: IEC certified candidate list (PDF, 16 Sept 2026)

This ward in earlier elections ?

ESP areas in this ward · 3 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 971 · spoilt 20 · special votes 0 · All 2 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

PR ballot figures for this ward are the sum of the IEC's results for its 2 voting districts; the IEC publishes the ward ballot per ward and the PR ballot per voting district.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 2 voting districts here (978 of 1 670). The IEC publishes 58.6%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same ward (the ward that covered the same area then), both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 353 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1073); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (789); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (538); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1657: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910034: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910034: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910034: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910034: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910034: party 1657: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910034: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910034: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910034: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910034: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910056: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (744); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910056: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (765); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910056: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (445); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910056: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910056: party 1657: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910056: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910056: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910056: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910056: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910056: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910056: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910056: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910056: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: KAREEBERG's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:50 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it