No majority
ANC 5 of 11 seats · 6 for a majority
Most party (PR) votes: ANC 43.2% · down 1.0 pts from 44.2% in 2021
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
PR ballot ? · 5 176 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress2 23743.2%
DADemocratic Alliance1 29525.0%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters73914.3%
PAPatriotic Alliance5009.7%- KCMKareeberg Civic Movement3306.4%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus751.4%
Council seats · 11 ?
- African National Congress4 ward · 1 PR5
- Democratic Alliance2 ward · 1 PR3
- Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
- Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
- Kareeberg Civic Movement0 ward · 1 PR1
Hours off in KAREEBERG ?
Reported in the ESP app
Wards · 6
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 0 · All 15 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 15 voting districts here (5 229 of 8 132). The IEC publishes 64.3%.
The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 418 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1248); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (614); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1657: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 410 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1253); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1657: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (481); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 353 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1073); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (789); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (538); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1657: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 311 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (945); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (616); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (317); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1657: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 528 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1573); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (826); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 533 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1521); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 344 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1050); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 16:50 SAST.