WardsANC 2PA 2VF PLUS 1DA 1darker = bigger win

Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the DC 40% ballot per ward

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC and PA 4 seats each of 11 · 6 for a majority

Most DC 40% votes: ANC 37.5% · down 2.8 pts from 40.3% in 2021

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

KAROO HOOGLANDAll 25 voting districts in

All 6 wards complete

Turnout63.9%

Voters on the roll7 762

South Africa · Counting23 385 of 23 696 voting districts in (98.7%)

checked 11:29Latest results

DC 40% ballot ? · 4 909 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress1 84337.5%
PAPatriotic Alliance1 72335.1%
DADemocratic Alliance87417.8%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus3968.1%
NCMNamakwa Civic Movement460.9%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters80.2%
COPECongress of the People70.1%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change50.1%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement40.1%
SACPSouth African Communist Party20.0%
NEFNational Economic Fighters10.0%

Council seats · 11 ?

African National Congress2 ward · 2 PR4
Patriotic Alliance2 ward · 2 PR4
Democratic Alliance1 ward · 1 PR2
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 ward · 0 PR1

Hours off in KAROO HOOGLAND ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet9hours off1 outage

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

Karoo HooglandPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 077 · All 25 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 25 voting districts here (4 962 of 7 762). The IEC publishes 63.9%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 598 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1789); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 329 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (980); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (788); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 507 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1512); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (611); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 624 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1909); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 531 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1588); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 16:50 SAST.