KAROO HOOGLAND

Get the app
Ward 4: PA 46.4%Ward 1: ANC 49.0%Ward 2: ANC 41.8%Ward 3: VF PLUS 35.7%Ward 5: DA 39.6%Ward 6: PA 47.9%
WardsANC 2PA 2VF PLUS 1DA 1darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2006 Ward 3 (2006 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

No majority

ANC and PA 4 seats each of 11 · 6 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 38.0%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

KAROO HOOGLANDAll 25 voting districts in
All 6 wards complete
Turnout63.9%
Voters on the roll7 762
South Africa · Counting23 571 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.5%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 4 885 valid votes

  1. ANCAfrican National Congress1 85538.0%
  2. PAPatriotic Alliance1 71235.0%
  3. DADemocratic Alliance82316.8%
  4. VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus4258.7%
  5. NCMNamakwa Civic Movement491.0%
  6. MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement120.2%
  7. EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters90.2%

Council seats · 11 ?

  1. African National Congress2 ward · 2 PR4
  2. Patriotic Alliance2 ward · 2 PR4
  3. Democratic Alliance1 ward · 1 PR2
  4. Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 ward · 0 PR1

Hours off in KAROO HOOGLAND ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet9hours off1 outage
May: 0 hours off0MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug: 0 hours off0AugSep: 0 hours off0SepOct · Internet: 9 hours offOct: 9 hours off9Oct

2006 Ward 3, KAROO HOOGLAND in 2026 ?

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 077 · All 25 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 25 voting districts here (4 962 of 7 762). The IEC publishes 63.9%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 598 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1789); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 329 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (980); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (788); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 507 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1512); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (611); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 624 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1909); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 531 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1588); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 16:50 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it