KGATELOPELE

Ward 1: not in yetWard 2: not in yetWard 3: VF PLUS 35.0% (Ward ballot)Ward 4: ANC 35.4% (Ward ballot)Ward 5: not in yetWard 6: not in yet
WardsVF PLUS 1ANC 1No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the DC 40% ballot per ward
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC 29.7%

Leading on the DC 40% ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · DC 40% ballot
  • ANC 29.7%
  • DA 28.2%
  • RTC 16.1%
  • Others 26.1%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 552 of 23 696 voting districts in (6.5%)checked Latest results
KGATELOPELE4 of 11 voting districts in2 of 6 wards complete
Turnout so far58.5%
Voters on the roll so far3 423

DC 40% ballot ? · 1 950 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did KGATELOPELE vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in KGATELOPELE ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 377 · 4 of 11 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 4 voting districts with results so far here (2 001 of 3 423). The IEC publishes 58.5%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (574); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (575); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 489 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1462); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 332 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1014); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (842); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:34 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it