WardsANC 4VF PLUS 1DA 1darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2000 Ward 2 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC 4 of 11 seats · 6 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 35.0%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

KGATELOPELEAll 11 voting districts in

All 6 wards complete

Turnout57.8%

Voters on the roll9 757

South Africa · Counting23 062 of 23 696 voting districts in (97.3%)

checked 01:00Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 5 536 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress1 93935.0%
RTCRise Tsantsabane Communities1 05719.1%
DADemocratic Alliance1 02518.5%
PAPatriotic Alliance66712.0%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus3666.6%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters2694.9%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement751.4%
LABOURLabour Party of South Africa591.1%
KSRKhoisan Revolution480.9%
AZAPOAzanian People's Organisation180.3%
SACPSouth African Communist Party130.2%

Council seats · 11 ?

African National Congress4 ward · 0 PR4
Democratic Alliance1 ward · 1 PR2
Rise Tsantsabane Communities0 ward · 2 PR2
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 ward · 0 PR1
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in KGATELOPELE ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 2, Dan-Lime in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

KgatelopelePower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 222 · All 11 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 11 voting districts here (5 641 of 9 757). The IEC publishes 57.9%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 565 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1696); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (811); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (869); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (641); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (572); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (574); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (575); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 489 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1462); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 332 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1014); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (842); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (634); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (341); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 406 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (602); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (609); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 08:34 SAST.