KHâI-MA

Get the app
Ward 1: ANC 55.0%Ward 3: PA 49.4%Ward 4: PA 32.1%Ward 5: ANC 52.2%Ward 6: ANC 52.5%Ward 2: ANC 41.2%
WardsANC 4PA 2darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2011 Ward 2 (2011 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

No majority

ANC 5 of 11 seats · 6 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 46.5%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

KHâI-MAAll 13 voting districts in
All 6 wards complete
Turnout60.9%
Voters on the roll9 169
South Africa · Counting23 062 of 23 696 voting districts in (97.3%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 5 539 valid votes

Council seats · 11 ?

  1. African National Congress4 ward · 1 PR5
  2. Patriotic Alliance2 ward · 2 PR4
  3. Democratic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
  4. South African Communist Party0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in KHâI-MA ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages

2011 Ward 2, KHâI-MA in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 790 · All 13 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 13 voting districts here (5 586 of 9 169). The IEC publishes 61.4%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 638 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1894); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 452 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 457 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 371 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (399); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1474); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 425 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (538); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (507); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 411 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 307 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1024); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1371); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (449); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 05:32 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it