!KHEIS

Get the app
Ward 2: ANC 44.2%Ward 3: ANC 54.2%Ward 4: ANC 36.3%Ward 6: ANC 49.2%Ward 1: ANC 51.8%Ward 5: ANC 68.0%
WardsANC 6darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2011 Ward 1 (2011 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC majority

6 of 11 seats

Most ward votes: ANC 50.3%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

!KHEISAll 15 voting districts in
All 6 wards complete
Turnout67.2%
Voters on the roll11 182
South Africa · Counting23 039 of 23 696 voting districts in (97.2%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 7 442 valid votes

Council seats · 11 ?

  1. African National Congress6 ward · 0 PR6
  2. Democratic Alliance0 ward · 3 PR3
  3. Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
  4. Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in !KHEIS ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages

2011 Ward 1, !KHEIS in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 558 · All 15 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 15 voting districts here (7 514 of 11 182). The IEC publishes 67.3%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1465); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (942); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 632 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1894); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 315 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (940); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (855); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 730 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1015); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (707); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 460 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1389); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 326 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (998); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (677); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 808 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (481); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 620 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1860); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 539 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1617); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 07:04 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it