WardsANC 4DA 2darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2000 Ward 3 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC 4 of 11 seats · 6 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 40.0%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

MagarengAll 16 voting districts in

All 6 wards complete

Turnout58.5%

Voters on the roll12 896

South Africa · Counting22 726 of 23 696 voting districts in (95.9%)

checked 22:38Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 7 514 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress3 00340.0%
DADemocratic Alliance1 41318.8%
SACPSouth African Communist Party1 02113.6%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters6999.3%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party5066.7%
PAPatriotic Alliance3304.4%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus2253.0%
SPSDFSol- Plaatjie Service Delivery Forum1632.2%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania620.8%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement530.7%
ACPAll Citizens Party390.5%

Council seats · 11 ?

African National Congress4 ward · 0 PR4
Democratic Alliance2 ward · 0 PR2
South African Communist Party0 ward · 2 PR2
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
Umkhonto Wesizwe Party0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Magareng ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 3, Warrenton in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

MagarengPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 927 · All 16 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 16 voting districts here (7 538 of 12 896). The IEC publishes 59.0%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 497 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 373 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1074); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (691); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 610 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1760); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (700); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (565); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (260); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 593 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1764); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 340 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1013); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (701); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 476 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1421); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 784 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (703); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (614); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (304); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 16:50 SAST.