WardsANC 4DA 3NCM 1PA 1darker = bigger win

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC and DA 6 seats each of 17 · 9 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 34.0% · down 8.4 pts from 42.4% in 2021

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

NAMA KHOIAll 22 voting districts in

All 9 wards complete

Turnout54.2%

Voters on the roll31 144

South Africa · Counting19 280 of 23 696 voting districts in (81.4%)

checked 12:19Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 16 689 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress5 66934.0%
DADemocratic Alliance5 36232.1%
NCMNamakwa Civic Movement2 51615.1%
PAPatriotic Alliance2 41014.4%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus4652.8%
SACPSouth African Communist Party1380.8%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters660.4%
NEFNational Economic Fighters450.3%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement70.0%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement70.0%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement40.0%

Council seats · 17 ?

African National Congress4 ward · 2 PR6
Democratic Alliance3 ward · 3 PR6
Namakwa Civic Movement1 ward · 2 PR3
Patriotic Alliance1 ward · 1 PR2

Hours off in NAMA KHOI ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power370hours off33 outages

Water32hours off2 outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

Wards · 9

On EskomSePush

Nama KhoiPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 3 405 · All 22 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 22 voting districts here (16 885 of 31 144). The IEC publishes 54.3%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 721 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 563 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1626); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (453); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (317); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 837 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2574); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 810 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (678); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 716 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 520 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1519); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (598); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 973 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2933); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 277 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (825); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (633); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3718); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 657 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1932); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 544 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1656); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 381 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 776 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 649 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1968); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 443 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1400); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 361 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1031); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 521 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1527); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (678); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (579); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 418 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 414 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 408 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 406 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (375); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 795 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 718 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 20:34 SAST.