RICHTERSVELD

Get the app
Ward 1: ANC 62.5%Ward 2: ANC 45.2%Ward 5: ANC 41.8%Ward 6: ANC 48.4%Ward 3: ANC 54.3%Ward 4: ANC 43.0%
WardsANC 6darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2000 Ward 4 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

ANC majority

6 of 11 seats

Most ward votes: ANC 49.5%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

RICHTERSVELDAll 10 voting districts in
All 6 wards complete
Turnout63.8%
Voters on the roll7 692
South Africa · Counting22 893 of 23 696 voting districts in (96.6%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 4 880 valid votes

  1. ANCAfrican National Congress2 41549.5%
  2. PAPatriotic Alliance1 33727.4%
  3. DADemocratic Alliance92719.0%
  4. EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1042.1%
  5. VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus741.5%
  6. NEFNational Economic Fighters150.3%
  7. SACPSouth African Communist Party80.2%

Council seats · 11 ?

  1. African National Congress6 ward · 0 PR6
  2. Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 3 PR3
  3. Democratic Alliance0 ward · 2 PR2

Hours off in RICHTERSVELD ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power28hours off2 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul · Power: 22 hours offJul: 22 hours off22JulAug: 0 hours off0AugSep · Power: 7 hours offSep: 7 hours off7SepOct: 0 hours off0Oct

2000 Ward 4, Richtersveld in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 843 · All 10 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 10 voting districts here (4 904 of 7 692). The IEC publishes 63.8%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 442 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 293 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (878); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 264 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (782); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 501 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (721); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1075); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (748); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (584); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (694); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 590 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1748); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1076); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (772); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 10:05 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it