SIYANCUMA

Ward 2: ANC 41.3%Ward 3: 1 of 2 voting districts in, DA 61.5% so farWard 4: DA 52.8%Ward 5: SIF 52.6%Ward 6: ANC 42.5%Ward 1: ANC 38.6%Ward 7: ANC 45.2%
WardsANC 4DA 2SIF 1Partly counted 1darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2000 Ward 1 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

No majority

ANC 4 of 13 seats · 7 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 33.7%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

SIYANCUMA25 of 26 voting districts in
6 of 7 wards complete
Turnout so far59.2%
Voters on the roll so far17 343
South Africa · Counting22 893 of 23 696 voting districts in (96.6%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 10 008 valid votes

Council seats · 13 ?

  1. African National Congress4 ward · 0 PR4
  2. Siyancuma Independent Forum1 ward · 2 PR3
  3. Democratic Alliance2 ward · 0 PR2
  4. Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 2 PR2
  5. Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
  6. Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did SIYANCUMA vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in SIYANCUMA ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 1, Siyancuma in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 7

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 384 · 25 of 26 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 25 voting districts with results so far here (10 266 of 17 343). The IEC publishes 59.3%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 586 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1792); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 420 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (561); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (462); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 637 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1865); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 602 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1878); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1025 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3073); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 417 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (639); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 501 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1760); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (691); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (582); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 473 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1064); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (346); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 743 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 285 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (874); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (817); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 22:14 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it