No majority
ANC 5 of 11 seats · 6 for a majority
Most ward votes: ANC 39.6%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 8 359 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress3 30739.6%- DBOKKE2 35728.2%
DADemocratic Alliance1 18214.1%- SGBSiyathemba Community Movement7298.7%
PAPatriotic Alliance4805.7%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1882.2%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters620.7%- SACPSouth African Communist Party370.4%
- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement170.2%
Council seats · 11 ?
- African National Congress5 ward · 0 PR5
- Dbokke0 ward · 3 PR3
- Democratic Alliance1 ward · 0 PR1
- Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
- Siyathemba Community Movement0 ward · 1 PR1
Hours off in SIYATHEMBA ?
Reported in the ESP app
2000 Ward 3, Priemanday in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 6
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 1 492 · All 21 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 21 voting districts here (8 434 of 13 724). The IEC publishes 61.5%.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 892 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2700); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1912: the IEC's cross-ballot total 608 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1212); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (631); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (528); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 703 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2121); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1912: the IEC's cross-ballot total 595 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1181); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (486); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 410 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1227); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1912: the IEC's cross-ballot total 397 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (794); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (708); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (423); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1169); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (681); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (521); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (403); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1912: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 470 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1420); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 387 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1192); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1912: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (454); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 529 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1597); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1912: the IEC's cross-ballot total 414 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (821); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (499); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (364); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:17 SAST.