Sol Plaatje

special votes 13 421 · All 73 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 73 voting districts here (76 765 of 142 088). The IEC publishes 54.5%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 752 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 560 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1744); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 523 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1612); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 662 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1982); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 615 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1874); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 544 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1623); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (411); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1020 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2963); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 721 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 625 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1880); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 969 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2913); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (848); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1075 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (816); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (406); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 981 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2999); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 277 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (818); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 932 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2795); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 358 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1096); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (880); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3675); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (708); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1316 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3718); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 367 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1028 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3076); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 473 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 301 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (958); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (354); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1066); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (575); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1003 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 329 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (975); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 733 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (743); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (514); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3920); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 374 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1090); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 316 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (922); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (416); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 839 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2499); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 534 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1596); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (674); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (497); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (497); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 580 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1728); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 567 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1338 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3905); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (820); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (584); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 741 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 607 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1824); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (587); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 913 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2765); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 305 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (756); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (860); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1335 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4012); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 377 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1093); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 337 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (960); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (434); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1294 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3877); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 372 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1056); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 335 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1017); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (612); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (394); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3624); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 512 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1516); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 359 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1019); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (823); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (769); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1814 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5466); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 470 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 287 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (840); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2073 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 632 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1888); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1279 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3793); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 485 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1091); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1042); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 294 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (907); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (493); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3474); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 562 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1740); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (349); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3613); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 525 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1555); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (682); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 872 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2622); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 767 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 745 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (635); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 656 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1991); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 479 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1424); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (965); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (491); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3777); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 381 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 374 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (616); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (527); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (317); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 305 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (925); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (799); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1315 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3719); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (816); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (636); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (491); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (481); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 903 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2734); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 358 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (966); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (610); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1659: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2139: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:17 SAST.