ANC 53.5%
Leading on the DC 40% ballot so far (provisional)
- ANC 53.5%
- VF PLUS 18.1%
- DA 10.6%
- Others 17.8%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
DC 40% ballot ? · 2 097 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress1 12153.5%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus38018.1%
DADemocratic Alliance22210.6%
PAPatriotic Alliance1698.1%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1376.5%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party201.0%- SACPSouth African Communist Party180.9%
- SGBSiyathemba Community Movement160.8%
- SIFSiyancuma Independent Forum60.3%
- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement40.2%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party20.1%
NCCMNorthern Cape Communities Movement20.1%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did THEMBELIHLE vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in THEMBELIHLE ?
Reported in the ESP app
Wards · 6
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 383 · 12 of 16 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 12 voting districts with results so far here (2 113 of 4 266). The IEC publishes 49.5%.
The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 669 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1994); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2051: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (715); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2051: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (521); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2051: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (977); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2051: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:34 SAST.