WardsRTC 7darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2000 Ward 2 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

RTC majority

7 of 13 seats

Most ward votes: RTC 43.5%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

TSANTSABANEAll 28 voting districts in

All 7 wards complete

Turnout56.9%

Voters on the roll23 415

South Africa · Counting22 968 of 23 696 voting districts in (96.9%)

checked 23:58Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 13 105 valid votes

RTCRise Tsantsabane Communities5 70743.5%
ANCAfrican National Congress3 85229.4%
DADemocratic Alliance1 41910.8%
PAPatriotic Alliance8676.6%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters7045.4%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus3913.0%
GTCFGreater Tsantsabane Community Front690.5%
SACPSouth African Communist Party600.5%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement320.2%
KSRKhoisan Revolution40.0%

Council seats · 13 ?

Rise Tsantsabane Communities7 ward · 0 PR7
African National Congress0 ward · 3 PR3
Democratic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in TSANTSABANE ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power21hours off3 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 2, Re A Ipela in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 7

On EskomSePush

TsantsabanePower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 231 · All 28 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 28 voting districts here (13 334 of 23 415). The IEC publishes 57.0%.

Note: ward 1: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 899 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2703); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 676 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1972); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (728); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (581); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (449); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1983: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 575 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1726); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 552 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1622); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1983: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 792 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 586 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1702); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (985); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (867); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1983: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3529); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 639 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1916); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (347); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1983: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 709 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 690 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2053); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (655); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1983: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 511 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 444 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1341); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1983: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1034 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3082); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 546 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1626); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1983: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 14:01 SAST.