UBUNTU

Get the app
Ward 1: Independent 38.7%Ward 3: ANC 45.3%Ward 4: ANC 49.3%Ward 5: ANC 57.4%Ward 6: ANC 49.6%Ward 2: ANC 50.5%
WardsANC 5Independent 1darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2021 Ward 2 (2021 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC 5 of 11 seats · 6 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 48.1%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

UBUNTUAll 22 voting districts in
All 6 wards complete
Turnout62.5%
Voters on the roll10 600
South Africa · Counting23 062 of 23 696 voting districts in (97.3%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 6 517 valid votes

  1. ANCAfrican National Congress3 13548.1%
  2. DADemocratic Alliance1 61724.8%
  3. PAPatriotic Alliance1 10416.9%
  4. IndependentIndependent candidates4607.1%
  5. VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1352.1%
  6. IFPInkatha Freedom Party280.4%
  7. EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters200.3%
  8. SACPSouth African Communist Party180.3%

Council seats · 11 ?

  1. African National Congress5 ward · 0 PR5
  2. Democratic Alliance0 ward · 3 PR3
  3. Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 2 PR2
Independent councillors1

Hours off in UBUNTU ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages

2021 Ward 2, UBUNTU in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 859 · All 22 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 22 voting districts here (6 624 of 10 600). The IEC publishes 62.5%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (991); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (745); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 520 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1555); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 355 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1035); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 586 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1810); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 417 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (673); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 597 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1801); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (821); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (822); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 666 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1987); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (790); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (581); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 462 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 06:17 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it