UMSOBOMVU

Get the app
Ward 1: ANC 84.1%Ward 2: ANC 84.8%Ward 3: ANC 52.9%Ward 4: ANC 68.5%Ward 6: ANC 61.0%Ward 7: ANC 49.5%Ward 5: ANC 47.5%
WardsANC 7darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2011 Ward 5 (2011 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC majority

9 of 13 seats

Most ward votes: ANC 64.8%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

UMSOBOMVUAll 26 voting districts in
All 7 wards complete
Turnout66.1%
Voters on the roll17 476
South Africa · Counting22 625 of 23 696 voting districts in (95.5%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 11 405 valid votes

  1. ANCAfrican National Congress7 39464.8%
  2. EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters2 00917.6%
  3. DADemocratic Alliance1 0108.9%
  4. PAPatriotic Alliance7486.6%
  5. VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1861.6%
  6. SACPSouth African Communist Party580.5%

Council seats · 13 ?

  1. African National Congress7 ward · 2 PR9
  2. Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 2 PR2
  3. Democratic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
  4. Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in UMSOBOMVU ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power29hours off2 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug · Power: 29 hours offAug: 29 hours off29AugSep: 0 hours off0SepOct: 0 hours off0Oct

2011 Ward 5, UMSOBOMVU in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 7

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 2 205 · All 26 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 26 voting districts here (11 556 of 17 476). The IEC publishes 66.2%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1558 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4683); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1623 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4900); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (429); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 805 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 545 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1631); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 931 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2737); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 287 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (888); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 736 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 370 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1079); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (899); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 804 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 387 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 937 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2808); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (893); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (722); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 07:52 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it