Dots: voting stations

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

ANC 42.4%

Most ward votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting5 293 of 23 696 voting districts in (22.3%)checked 08:59Latest results

Turnout56.3%

Voters on the roll1 498

Voting station

St John Apostolic ChurchPhase 7 Bohlokong BethlehemBohlokong, Bethlehem

Ward ballot ? · 837 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress35542.4%
DADemocratic Alliance15218.2%
IndependentIndependent candidates12014.3%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters536.3%
SACPSouth African Communist Party344.1%
BATHOBatho Movement303.6%
ActionSA263.1%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus253.0%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party111.3%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party70.8%
AHCAfrican Heart Congress60.7%
ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation50.6%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania30.4%
PAPatriotic Alliance30.4%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement30.4%
ACMAfrican Content Movement10.1%
AMC.ROY.African Movement Congress10.1%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement10.1%
ALMAfrican Liberation Movement10.1%

ESP areas in this voting district · 1 ?

Bohlokong

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 844 · spoilt 16 · special votes 152 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (844 of 1 498). The IEC publishes 56.5%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 405 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (495); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 0: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2056: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2007: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 55: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Dihlabeng's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 06:15 SAST.