Tsepano 111 Public School

Get the app
Voting district 22160012: DA 54.1%Voting district 22410054: ANC 69.5%Voting district 22410098: ANC 71.9%Voting district 22410278: VF PLUS 35.7%Voting district 22410469: ANC 60.3%Voting district 22270069: ANC 56.9%Moriting Wa Thuto Secondary School (VD 22160012)Tsepano 111 Public School (VD 22270069)Tent Next To Welvanpas Primary School (VD 22410054)Loskop Farm (VD 22410098)Tent At Caroline Farm (VD 22410278)Breda Combined Farm School (VD 22410469)
Voting districtsANC 4DA 1VF PLUS 1darker = bigger win
Dots: voting stations
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC 56.9%down 8.5 pts from 65.4% in 2021

Most party (PR) votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout54.7%
Voters on the roll1 827
South Africa · Counting20 515 of 23 696 voting districts in (86.6%)
checked Latest results

Voting station

Tsepano 111 Public SchoolBethlehemBethlehem, Bethlehem

PR ballot ? · 985 valid votes

ESP areas in this voting district · 2 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 1 000 · spoilt 15 · special votes 139 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (1 000 of 1 827). The IEC publishes 57.1%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 560 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1718); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 307 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (903); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2077: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1370: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1545: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: the IEC's published turnout for this voting district is 57.09%; its own counts give 54.73% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters); we show the calculated figure.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Dihlabeng's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 16:17 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it