Angels of God Ministry

Get the app
Voting district 32951189: ActionSA 37.0%Voting district 32951820: ANC 44.2%Voting district 32952124: ANC 43.9%Voting district 32952179: ANC 47.0%Voting district 32952326: ActionSA 49.5%Voting district 32952427: ANC 47.9%Voting district 32953361: ANC 49.5%Voting district 32953372: ANC 38.2%Voting district 33150158: ActionSA 53.3%Voting district 33190107: ActionSA 31.3%Voting district 33150215: ANC 34.7%Stanza Bopape High School (VD 32951189)New Day Ministries Church (VD 32951820)Reformed Apostolic Church Phase 1 (VD 32952124)Union Apostilic Faith Mission Church (VD 32952179)Power Tubbies Learning Centre (VD 32952326)Life Giving Ministries (VD 32952427)Powerhouse Baptist Church (VD 32953361)Gem Valley Kid Tabernacle (VD 32953372)Tent @ Be Shikwambana Street (VD 33150158)Angels of God Ministry (VD 33150215)Hope Resurrection Worship Center (VD 33190107)
Voting districtsANC 7ActionSA 4darker = bigger win
Dots: voting stations
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC 34.7%down 18.2 pts from 52.9% in 2021

Most party (PR) votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout57.9%
Voters on the roll1 504
South Africa · Counting20 715 of 23 696 voting districts in (87.4%)
checked Latest results

Voting station

Angels of God MinistryAmanda Street Amanda Park MamelodiAmanda Park, Mamelodi

PR ballot ? · 855 valid votes

ESP areas in this voting district · 2 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 871 · spoilt 16 · special votes 52 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (871 of 1 504). The IEC publishes 58.6%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (586); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1948: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 16:21 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it