Dots: voting stations

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

MKP 28.9%

Most ward votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout47.0%

Voters on the roll1 231

South Africa · Counting5 793 of 23 696 voting districts in (24.4%)

checked 09:48Latest results

Voting station

Ubuhle Be Allen Primary SchoolAllen Farm Buhle Be Allen Number Amajuba District MunicipalityBuhle Be Allen Number, Amajuba District Municipality

Ward ballot ? · 546 valid votes

MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party15828.9%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party15428.2%
ANCAfrican National Congress6511.9%
MPMMajuba Progressive Movement6411.7%
SSMSisonke Solidarity Movement407.3%
DADemocratic Alliance152.7%
SACPSouth African Communist Party101.8%
AAMAmandla Awethu Movement71.3%
KZNIKzn Independence61.1%
AMC.ROY.African Movement Congress40.7%
NDRFNewcastle and District Residents Forum40.7%
IRCInternational Revelation Congress30.5%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters30.5%
CFPCommunity Freedom Party30.5%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party20.4%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement20.4%
ISPInsika Yesizwe Party20.4%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah10.2%
NFPNational Freedom Party10.2%
ARUAfrican Renaissance Unity10.2%
SDPService Delivery Party10.2%

ESP areas in this voting district · 2 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 579 · spoilt 18 · special votes 0 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (579 of 1 231). The IEC publishes 47.0%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (484); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (478); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2127: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2032: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1908: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1497: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1910: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Dannhauser's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 06:21 SAST.