DA majority
9 of 13 seats
Most ward votes: DA 64.6%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 18 093 valid votes
DADemocratic Alliance11 68464.6%
PAPatriotic Alliance2 42713.4%
ANCAfrican National Congress1 82510.1%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus9385.2%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters3762.1%
GOOD1911.1%- IndependentIndependent candidates1721.0%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change1540.9%- SACPSouth African Communist Party1000.6%
- CCCNational Coloured Congress830.5%
CAPEXITCape Independence Party / Kaapse Onafhanklikheids Party560.3%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement390.2%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement250.1%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement230.1%
Council seats · 13 ?
- Democratic Alliance7 ward · 2 PR9
- Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 2 PR2
- Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
- African National Congress0 ward · 1 PR1
Hours off in Bergrivier ?
Reported in the ESP app
2006 Ward 6, Bergrivier in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 7
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 2 305 · All 22 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 22 voting districts here (18 221 of 32 950). The IEC publishes 55.7%.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1268 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3967); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (553); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (453); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3591); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (583); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (467); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (371); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1667 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4967); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (763); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (406); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1469 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4084); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 702 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1181); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1777); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 946 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2801); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 646 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1943); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 441 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1322); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1809 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5434); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3300); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (878); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 281 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (830); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (532); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3321 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10057); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 325 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (838); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:31 SAST.