Breede Valley

Get the app
Ward 1: BO 45.1%Ward 2: ANC 53.0%Ward 3: DA 33.2%Ward 6: DA 73.9%Ward 7: DA 75.3%Ward 8: ANC 41.7%Ward 9: DA 56.5%Ward 10: DA 51.7%Ward 11: DA 50.1%Ward 12: DA 55.5%Ward 13: DA 57.7%Ward 14: DA 28.6%Ward 15: DA 78.5%Ward 16: ANC 57.2%Ward 17: ANC 69.1%Ward 18: DA 39.5%Ward 19: DA 65.0%Ward 20: DA 57.7%Ward 21: ANC 32.1%Ward 4: DA 54.1%Ward 5: DA 52.6%
WardsDA 15ANC 5BO 1darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2000 Ward 4 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

No majority

DA 20 of 41 seats · 21 for a majority

Most ward votes: DA 47.7%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Breede ValleyAll 58 voting districts in
All 21 wards complete
Turnout49.7%
Voters on the roll84 867
South Africa · Counting23 062 of 23 696 voting districts in (97.3%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 42 472 valid votes

Council seats · 41 ?

  1. Democratic Alliance15 ward · 5 PR20
  2. African National Congress5 ward · 2 PR7
  3. Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 5 PR5
  4. Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 3 PR3
  5. Breedevallei Onafhanklik1 ward · 2 PR3
  6. African Christian Democratic Party0 ward · 1 PR1
  7. Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
  8. GOOD0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Breede Valley ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power525hours off49 outages
Water133hours off12 outages
Internet79hours off6 outages
May · Power: 329 hours offMay · Water: 100 hours offMay · Internet: 68 hours offMay: 497 hours off497MayJun · Power: 78 hours offJun · Water: 10 hours offJun: 88 hours off88JunJul · Power: 25 hours offJul · Water: 6 hours offJul · Internet: 11 hours offJul: 42 hours off42JulAug · Power: 17 hours offAug: 17 hours off17AugSep · Power: 42 hours offSep: 42 hours off42SepOct · Power: 34 hours offOct · Water: 17 hours offOct: 51 hours off51Oct

2000 Ward 4, Breede Valley in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 21

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 645 · All 58 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 58 voting districts here (42 145 of 84 867). The IEC publishes 50.8%.

Note: ward 1: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 899 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2562); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 327 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1005); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 253 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (848); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (587); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (419); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1034 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (894); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (656); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (459); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 593 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1772); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 549 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1611); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 406 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1041 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3075); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 468 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (529); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3876); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 394 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 372 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (770); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1105: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1941 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5775); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 486 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1506); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6409); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 522 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1668); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 877 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2524); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 741 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (641); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1056 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 323 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (953); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (518); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (399); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1105: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1016 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 358 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (750); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1071 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 420 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1094); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 352 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1058); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1105: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3042); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 418 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (891); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (536); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1018 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3046); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (743); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (755); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 497 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1813); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 451 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (507); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (565); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1105: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2050 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6028); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 395 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 821 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2440); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 339 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (966); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (511); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 976 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2922); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (691); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 734 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 607 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1861); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (499); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1105: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1012 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3004); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (559); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1105: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3615); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (650); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (522); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1105: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 729 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 658 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1979); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 588 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1721); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:07 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it