WardsDA 5ANC 1darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2000 Ward 1 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

DA 5 of 11 seats · 6 for a majority

Most ward votes: DA 45.6%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Cape AgulhasAll 18 voting districts in

All 6 wards complete

Turnout58.4%

Voters on the roll23 195

South Africa · Counting23 062 of 23 696 voting districts in (97.3%)

checked 00:51Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 13 336 valid votes

DADemocratic Alliance6 07945.6%
PAPatriotic Alliance2 37417.8%
ANCAfrican National Congress1 86614.0%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 48911.2%
DLRPDienslewerings Party1 1588.7%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters960.7%
CCCNational Coloured Congress950.7%
GOOD750.6%
SAFSouth Africa First390.3%
SNPSpectrum National Party240.2%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement160.1%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement140.1%
UATUnited Africans Transformation110.1%

Council seats · 11 ?

Democratic Alliance5 ward · 0 PR5
African National Congress1 ward · 1 PR2
Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 2 PR2
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
Dienslewerings Party0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Cape Agulhas ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power223hours off34 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 1, Cape Agulhas in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Ward 4All of 2000 ward 1 · 2026: DA 67.1%

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

Cape AgulhasPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 095 · All 18 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 18 voting districts here (13 555 of 23 195). The IEC publishes 58.6%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3527); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 472 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1474); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (620); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1017: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 735 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 524 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1683); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1017: the IEC's cross-ballot total 485 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (957); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 311 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (963); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 537 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1633); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 427 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (829); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1017: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (294); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1449 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4450); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 577 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1656); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1017: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1768 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 590 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1813); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (933); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (823); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1017: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 694 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 589 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1871); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 354 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1070); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1017: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (549); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 10:37 SAST.