WardsDA 3CE 2ANC 1darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2021 Ward 6 (2021 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

DA 4 of 11 seats · 6 for a majority

Most ward votes: DA 30.6%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

CederbergAll 24 voting districts in

All 6 wards complete

Turnout49.8%

Voters on the roll29 719

South Africa · Counting22 113 of 23 696 voting districts in (93.3%)

checked 19:48Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 14 801 valid votes

DADemocratic Alliance4 53630.6%
ANCAfrican National Congress3 28222.2%
PAPatriotic Alliance2 29915.5%
CECederberg First Residents Association2 23315.1%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus5593.8%
CCCNational Coloured Congress5293.6%
A.C.C.Alliance of Citizens for Change4423.0%
SACPSouth African Communist Party3832.6%
IndependentIndependent candidates2922.0%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1070.7%
CAPEXITCape Independence Party / Kaapse Onafhanklikheids Party550.4%
SNPSpectrum National Party400.3%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change270.2%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement90.1%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement80.1%

Council seats · 11 ?

Democratic Alliance3 ward · 1 PR4
African National Congress1 ward · 2 PR3
Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 2 PR2
Cederberg First Residents Association2 ward · 0 PR2

Hours off in Cederberg ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power72hours off9 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2021 Ward 6, Cederberg in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Ward 6Same area · 2026: CE 41.2%

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

CederbergPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 450 · All 24 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 24 voting districts here (14 786 of 29 719). The IEC publishes 50.3%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 896 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2680); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 631 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1867); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (559); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1030 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3025); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 976 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2922); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 591 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1852); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 337 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (991); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1098 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 578 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1763); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 568 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1700); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (975); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 342 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (375); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1023 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3066); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 653 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1923); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 506 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1520); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (559); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (399); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1021 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 382 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (711); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (620); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (562); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 618 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1702); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 489 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (424); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (345); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:31 SAST.