City of Cape Town

special votes 70 954 · All 829 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 829 voting districts here (1 170 860 of 2 158 976). The IEC publishes 54.8%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10045 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 876 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1637); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (401); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (345); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9942 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19936); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1307 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2630); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (546); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (542); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (495); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (420); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (480); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (371); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9747 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19619); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (345); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (409); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (304); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5432 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10682); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1023 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2001); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 384 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (774); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 330 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (695); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (622); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (457); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11793 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23522); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 827 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1670); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (417); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3783 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7670); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1048 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2079); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 692 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 432 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (776); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (843); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (525); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6782 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14403); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3662 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 394 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (747); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (661); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 294 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (490); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (578); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (429); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10645 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1328 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2649); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8614); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1496 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3043); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1069 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1838); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 740 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1463); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 592 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 554 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (455); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (402); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6378 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12793); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 624 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 421 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (862); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (813); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 412 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (854); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (402); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11611 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23087); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 737 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1626); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (807); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (559); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (548); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 253 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (454); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (487); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4463); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 357 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (788); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (591); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 285 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (612); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8494 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16938); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 697 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (485); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (385); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8822 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 691 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 488 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 418 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (872); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 317 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (663); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 217 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (452); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (394); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16837); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 865 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1665); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1754 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3455); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 612 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 585 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 455 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (776); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (521); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (517); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14402); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1538 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 834 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1587); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 435 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (935); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 344 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (683); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (508); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (345); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6759); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 994 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1487); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 679 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 640 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1397); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (317); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6411 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12871); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 934 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1906); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 668 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 643 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 531 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 328 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (592); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 281 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (573); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (424); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8607); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1765 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3605); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 799 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1567); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 506 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (982); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 342 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (596); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (631); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (615); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (410); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12367 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24923); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5503 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11002); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 869 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1703); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 700 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1411); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 534 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 526 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1019); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 341 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (735); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (456); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (441); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9948 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19876); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 865 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1726); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (345); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (294); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2515 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2051 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4088); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 745 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1456); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 371 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (708); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 354 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (688); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 322 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (776); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (469); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6025 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12759); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 983 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (571); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (452); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 642 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 446 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (884); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 352 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (682); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (669); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (480); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (469); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (463); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (374); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 457 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1007); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 453 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (981); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (967); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 365 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (721); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 327 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (692); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (567); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7344 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14927); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1373 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2539); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 451 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (821); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 345 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (691); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 312 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 293 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (622); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (531); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 876 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1842); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 759 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 671 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (375); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (294); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8078); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 686 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 655 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 582 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 470 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1045); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 397 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (653); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4913 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9977); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1488 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2864); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 563 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 401 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (805); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 293 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (541); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (429); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3875 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7822); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1701 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1041 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (835); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4875); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1947 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3413); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 622 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 438 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (913); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (479); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4260 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 772 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1566); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 692 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1426); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 337 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (622); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (472); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3634 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7719); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 768 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1749); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 594 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 593 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1611); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6541); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1001 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1830); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 611 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 452 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (819); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (530); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3051 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 855 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1800); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 721 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1597); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (416); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (276); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3322 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6798); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 933 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1866); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 713 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1048); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 460 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (914); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (371); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3082 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1645 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 744 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1491); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (537); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2401 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5084); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1896 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3565); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 678 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (666); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6605); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2487); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 603 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1411); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 403 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (867); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (438); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12810); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 780 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1609); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 529 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1012); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (425); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (312); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5769 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 915 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1787); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 699 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1447); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 507 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (878); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 403 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (779); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 365 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (672); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (538); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (550); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (457); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3586 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1663 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 558 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 486 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (955); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (590); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (410); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 217 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (435); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 44: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5744 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11394); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 697 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 481 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (987); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 305 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (532); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (508); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (426); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (399); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (357); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 45: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3358 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6835); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1027 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1874); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 473 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (519); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (540); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (595); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (386); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3920 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7921); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1030 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1936); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 966 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1737); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 537 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (916); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 294 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (593); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (547); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (434); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 47: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10002); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1707 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3584); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 458 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1025); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 449 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1028); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 443 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (985); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (448); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (532); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (445); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 48: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5957 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11836); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 982 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1833); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 728 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1549); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 422 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (791); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 364 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (633); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (401); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 49: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5747 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 634 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 493 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1072); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 481 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (822); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 481 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (918); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 397 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (729); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4358 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 802 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1737); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 572 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 264 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (611); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (403); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (347); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 51: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2961 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6039); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2349); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 597 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 403 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (829); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (543); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (500); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 52: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7918 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15774); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 661 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1375); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 419 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (874); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (705); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (748); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (749); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 335 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (626); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (560); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 53: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8998 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (683); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 321 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (643); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 54: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8495 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16455); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 453 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (860); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 383 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (760); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 331 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (652); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 285 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (536); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (349); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 55: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8981); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4980); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 733 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1629); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (555); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (512); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (562); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (463); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (562); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 56: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10471); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1018 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2081); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 965 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2008); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 544 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1027); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 335 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (684); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (322); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 57: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9878 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19786); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 671 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1531); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (575); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (456); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 217 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (421); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (413); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 58: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7886 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15593); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 619 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (579); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (363); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 59: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4851 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9884); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2777 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5678); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1039 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 660 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1647); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 363 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (821); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (629); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 60: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6443 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 402 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (743); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 365 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (699); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 312 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (554); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 217 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 61: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7579 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 379 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (719); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 62: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8387 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16621); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 884 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1816); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 669 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 355 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (744); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 338 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (593); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 315 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (774); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (385); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 63: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8969 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17764); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 434 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (922); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 418 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (908); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (294); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 64: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5944 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 917 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1792); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 608 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (713); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (495); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (489); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (363); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (412); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 65: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5598 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1087); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 413 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (512); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (472); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (442); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (457); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 66: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10579); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 683 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 648 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 400 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (912); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (637); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (482); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 67: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5494 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2040); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 513 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (997); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 480 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (952); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (421); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (304); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 68: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6882 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 419 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (866); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (416); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (413); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 69: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12937 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25730); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 942 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1980); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 70: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8908 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17688); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 462 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (927); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 71: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7759 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 439 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (924); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 334 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (680); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 293 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (581); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (569); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (574); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (522); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (445); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (412); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 72: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9662 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19450); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (655); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (347); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 73: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5660 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1843 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 74: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6482 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1396 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2763); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 585 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 473 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (910); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 461 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (887); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (555); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (524); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 262 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (457); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 75: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3731 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7420); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2417); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1005 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1971); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 772 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1466); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 530 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1001); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 509 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1061); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (474); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 76: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9310 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18567); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1013 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2034); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 517 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1056); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (606); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (550); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (441); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 77: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5394 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10821); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1646 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3096); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 519 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1062); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 469 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (846); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 407 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (849); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 393 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (826); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 322 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (599); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 78: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5761 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11564); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 998 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2051); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 703 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 405 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (781); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (419); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 79: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7066); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1649 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2915); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 503 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1069); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 483 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1055); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (641); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 80: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4988 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10071); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 772 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1614); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 522 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (985); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 473 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (817); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 381 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (640); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 340 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (653); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 277 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 81: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4571 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 874 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1746); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 669 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 558 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1066); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 445 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (815); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (623); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 279 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (561); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (498); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (347); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 82: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11552 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1623 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3043); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (457); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 83: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9636 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 990 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1833); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 701 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 389 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (751); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (398); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 84: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3929 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7875); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3649 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 540 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1082); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 345 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (726); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 338 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (605); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (564); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (556); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (508); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 85: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6075 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11631); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1024 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 294 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (689); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (549); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 86: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 565 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 349 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (635); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 280 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (616); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 87: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2624 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5394); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1639 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 901 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1756); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (419); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 88: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3759 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7655); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1052 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1901); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 786 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1584); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 528 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1087); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (742); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (406); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 89: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10563 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 784 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1553); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (399); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 90: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5731 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 653 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 613 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 589 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (371); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 91: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4506 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1998 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3680); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2622); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 925 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1854); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 635 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 464 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1031); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (645); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 92: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 776 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1561); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 620 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 512 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1060); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 481 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1086); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (564); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (425); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 93: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4480 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8968); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2650); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 807 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1659); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 548 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (628); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 253 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 94: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5094 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 826 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1672); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 507 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1048); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (736); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 95: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4476 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8844); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1005 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1981); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 925 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1921); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 713 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 490 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1062); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 371 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (758); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (434); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 96: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4744 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9622); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1041 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1032 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1495); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 613 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 320 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (777); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 316 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (420); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (618); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (479); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 97: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3482 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7025); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1914 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3629); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 656 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1499); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 641 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (796); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 334 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (812); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (512); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (522); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 98: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4809 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9505); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 673 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 599 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (708); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (454); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (474); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 99: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16590); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1041 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2019); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 896 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1628); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 483 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (899); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 306 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (572); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 303 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (581); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (632); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 100: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3548 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 341 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (686); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 315 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (643); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (537); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (409); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 101: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10260 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20469); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1051 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (612); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (353); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 102: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11920 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 103: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3470 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6906); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1074 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 897 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1796); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 397 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (786); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (613); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (531); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (469); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 104: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7732 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15443); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 855 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1713); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 534 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 105: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3697 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4525); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 651 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (957); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 385 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (778); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 316 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (696); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (406); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (312); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 106: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8764 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17475); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 543 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1084); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (623); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (440); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 107: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3660 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2859); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 832 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1665); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 108: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4784 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9571); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 664 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 524 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (986); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (548); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (490); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (518); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 109: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4799 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9800); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 479 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (967); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 467 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (822); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 441 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (838); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (497); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (484); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (351); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 110: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2617); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 728 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 111: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11681 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23443); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 112: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 509 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1054); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (510); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 113: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3737 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1034 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2023); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 693 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1363); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 543 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (888); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 430 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (846); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 377 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (788); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 361 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (646); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1730: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 114: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6094 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 902 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1774); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 583 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 484 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (971); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 327 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (525); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1354: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 115: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 601 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1086); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 476 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (673); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 449 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (863); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (829); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 321 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (605); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 312 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (607); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (519); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (349); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 116: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9399 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18661); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 849 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1808); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 544 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 538 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1077); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 418 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (862); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (525); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1074: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 117: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3723 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1722 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3459); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 548 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 547 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1029); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 382 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (734); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 353 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (749); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (353); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 630: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1631: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1486: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1782: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 2069: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 2095: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 3214: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 2085: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 2097: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1966: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 118: party 1758: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 15:33 SAST.