DA 63.8%
Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)
- DA 63.8%
- PA 14.7%
- ANC 10.8%
- Others 10.8%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 3 226 valid votes
DADemocratic Alliance2 05863.8%
PAPatriotic Alliance47314.7%
ANCAfrican National Congress34710.8%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change932.9%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus872.7%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party411.3%
GOOD270.8%- CCCNational Coloured Congress220.7%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters170.5%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah150.5%
PDMPeople's Democratic Movement130.4%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania80.2%- AWEH!Aboriginal Warriors 4 Economic Hope!70.2%
CAPEXITCape Independence Party / Kaapse Onafhanklikheids Party60.2%
ARAAfrica Restoration Alliance30.1%- SDPService Delivery Party30.1%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement20.1%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement20.1%
- JOYAJoya Web3 Community Movement20.1%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Drakenstein vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Drakenstein ?
Reported in the ESP app
Wards · 33
- Ward 141 of 2 voting districts inDA 61.4%
- Ward 171 of 2 voting districts inDA 83.0%
- Ward 312 of 4 voting districts inDA 49.7%
- Ward 331 of 3 voting districts inDA 70.3%
- Ward 1Not in yet
- Ward 2Not in yet
- Ward 3Not in yet
- Ward 4Not in yet
- Ward 5Not in yet
- Ward 6Not in yet
- Ward 7Not in yet
- Ward 8Not in yet
- Ward 9Not in yet
- Ward 10Not in yet
- Ward 11Not in yet
- Ward 12Not in yet
- Ward 13Not in yet
- Ward 15Not in yet
- Ward 16Not in yet
- Ward 18–
- Ward 19Not in yet
- Ward 20Not in yet
- Ward 21Not in yet
- Ward 22Not in yet
- Ward 23Not in yet
- Ward 24Not in yet
- Ward 25Not in yet
- Ward 26Not in yet
- Ward 27Not in yet
- Ward 28Not in yet
- Ward 29Not in yet
- Ward 30Not in yet
- Ward 32Not in yet
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 413 · 6 of 75 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 6 voting districts with results so far here (3 253 of 7 342). The IEC publishes 44.3%.
The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 686 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2036); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (644); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 580 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1745); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2172: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (556); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 479 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1452); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (720); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (464); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2172: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (923); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 02:03 SAST.