Drakenstein

special votes 9 542 · All 75 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 75 voting districts here (83 315 of 146 417). The IEC publishes 57.6%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1522 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (620); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (483); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2172: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2565 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 662 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1476); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2014 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6066); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 287 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (804); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (421); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2172: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2994 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9031); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1027); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2172: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 808 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2504); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 662 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1962); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 370 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (912); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2172: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3497); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1326 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3989); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1052); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 773 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2345); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 501 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1470); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (720); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (465); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (456); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 973 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3060); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 489 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1402); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3967); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 397 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2172: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4606); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 464 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1610); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2172: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1029 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 534 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1457); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (454); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2172: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 987 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2954); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 615 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1883); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (471); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3555); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 618 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1870); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (468); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (538); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2853 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8605); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 361 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1039); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3927); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 367 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (432); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2172: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2377 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 566 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1487); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2172: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1864 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5654); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 315 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (896); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2840 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 330 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1015); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1046 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (455); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 882 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2669); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 460 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 420 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1305 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4033); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (822); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (679); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6644); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (687); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (598); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (516); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 883 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2637); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 804 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2394); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1035 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3064); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 758 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (465); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1099 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 504 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1515); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (341); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1066 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1011 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3039); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (827); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (560); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6874); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (893); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (630); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 400 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1554); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (818); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (480); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1091 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 763 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 488 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1503); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2172: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 827 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2507); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 776 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 397 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1941 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5791); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 476 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1455); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (449); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:31 SAST.