George

Get the app
Ward 1: DA 52.4%Ward 2: DA 76.0%Ward 3: DA 75.8%Ward 4: DA 78.4%Ward 5: DA 60.3%Ward 6: PA 41.1%Ward 7: PA 36.9%Ward 8: PA 53.6%Ward 9: ANC 64.3%Ward 10: ANC 74.0%Ward 11: DA 48.9%Ward 12: ANC 62.8%Ward 13: ANC 54.8%Ward 14: DA 43.9%Ward 15: ANC 60.1%Ward 17: PA 46.6%Ward 18: DA 76.3%Ward 19: DA 78.5%Ward 20: PA 48.7%Ward 21: ANC 68.0%Ward 22: DA 82.5%Ward 23: DA 69.9%Ward 24: PA 34.9%Ward 25: DA 46.6%Ward 26: DA 81.4%Ward 28: DA 77.8%Ward 16: PA 53.9%Ward 27: DA 50.5%
WardsDA 15PA 7ANC 6darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2016 Ward 16 (2016 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

DA majority

28 of 55 seats

Most ward votes: DA 49.9%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

GeorgeAll 63 voting districts in
All 28 wards complete
Turnout57.5%
Voters on the roll124k
South Africa · Counting22 113 of 23 696 voting districts in (93.3%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 70 559 valid votes

Council seats · 55 ?

  1. Democratic Alliance15 ward · 13 PR28
  2. Patriotic Alliance7 ward · 4 PR11
  3. African National Congress6 ward · 2 PR8
  4. Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 4 PR4
  5. African Christian Democratic Party0 ward · 1 PR1
  6. Plaaslike Besorgde Inwoners0 ward · 1 PR1
  7. Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
  8. GOOD0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in George ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power1 319hours off152 outages
Water111hours off11 outages
Internet253hours off23 outages
May · Power: 656 hours offMay · Water: 35 hours offMay · Internet: 130 hours offMay: 821 hours off821MayJun · Power: 119 hours offJun · Water: 43 hours offJun · Internet: 70 hours offJun: 232 hours off232JunJul · Power: 24 hours offJul · Water: 8 hours offJul · Internet: 14 hours offJul: 46 hours off46JulAug · Power: 104 hours offAug · Internet: 8 hours offAug: 112 hours off112AugSep · Power: 207 hours offSep · Water: 26 hours offSep · Internet: 6 hours offSep: 239 hours off239SepOct · Power: 208 hours offOct · Internet: 25 hours offOct: 233 hours off233Oct

2016 Ward 16, George in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 28

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 9 382 · All 63 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 63 voting districts here (71 150 of 123 810). The IEC publishes 57.8%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3744); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 887 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2647); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1937 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6072); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 520 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6726); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 556 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1550); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2004 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5952); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 345 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1052); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1724 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5351); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 433 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 427 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 888 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2666); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 830 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2538); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (566); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 836 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 688 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2046); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 460 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3436); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 784 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1019 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3031); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (645); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 884 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2602); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3524); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 784 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (478); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3812); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (769); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (260); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1020 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3056); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 357 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1067); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (353); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 950 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2851); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 801 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2429); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (833); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (510); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1651 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4922); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3487); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3700); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1013 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3045); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (548); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 624 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1718); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2287 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6871); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 456 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1372); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3743); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 714 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 332 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (986); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1405 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (570); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (538); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2884 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8730); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (831); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2418 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 453 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 397 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1093 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1026 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3033); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 581 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1827); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (499); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (354); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 869 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2655); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (917); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (504); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2695 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 451 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 604 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1856); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 477 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2387 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 464 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 12:00 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it