WardsDA 6ANC 3darker = bigger win

Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the DC 40% ballot per ward

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

DA majority

9 of 17 seats

Most DC 40% votes: DA 51.9% · up 0.4 pts from 51.5% in 2021

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

HessequaAll 27 voting districts in

All 9 wards complete

Turnout62.8%

Voters on the roll37 013

South Africa · Counting18 651 of 23 696 voting districts in (78.7%)

checked 11:08Latest results

DC 40% ballot ? · 23 128 valid votes

DADemocratic Alliance11 99851.9%
ANCAfrican National Congress4 89521.2%
PAPatriotic Alliance2 87912.4%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus2 2149.6%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change5952.6%
IRASAIndependent Ratepayers Association of SA1510.7%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party880.4%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters690.3%
CCCNational Coloured Congress420.2%
SACPSouth African Communist Party390.2%
CAPEXITCape Independence Party / Kaapse Onafhanklikheids Party380.2%
EUPPEden United People's Party260.1%
ARAAfrica Restoration Alliance120.1%
GOOD110.0%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party110.0%
OLAOne Love Alliance110.0%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement100.0%
ICOSAIndependent Civic Organisation of South Africa90.0%
AdvieskantoorAdvieskantoor50.0%
IPMIkhwezi Political Movement50.0%
BOSABuild One South Africa50.0%
TRUTHTruth and Solidarity Movement50.0%
KCAKnysna Civic Alliance30.0%
PBIPlaaslike Besorgde Inwoners20.0%
Kannaland Independent PartyKannaland Independent Party20.0%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement20.0%
KFKnysna First10.0%

Council seats · 17 ?

Democratic Alliance6 ward · 3 PR9
African National Congress3 ward · 1 PR4
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 2 PR2
Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 2 PR2

Hours off in Hessequa ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power213hours off20 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet42hours off5 outages

Wards · 9

On EskomSePush

HessequaPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 2 862 · All 27 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 27 voting districts here (23 253 of 37 013). The IEC publishes 62.9%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1868 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5612); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 396 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 377 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 941 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2923); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 294 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (882); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (695); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (449); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2900 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8584); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 606 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1926); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1480 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (667); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 924 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2738); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 378 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1054 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3005); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 808 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2435); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 596 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1904); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1369 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4042); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 701 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2086); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (718); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (581); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3692); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 563 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1674); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 410 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3754); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 335 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (985); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (514); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 16:18 SAST.