WardsICOSA 2DA 2PA 1darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2000 Ward 2 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ICOSA and DA 3 seats each of 10 · 6 for a majority

Most ward votes: ICOSA 27.2%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

KannalandAll 14 voting districts in

All 5 wards complete

Turnout59.4%

Voters on the roll16 376

South Africa · Counting22 997 of 23 696 voting districts in (97.1%)

checked 00:14Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 9 765 valid votes

ICOSAIndependent Civic Organisation of South Africa2 65527.2%
DADemocratic Alliance2 27123.3%
PAPatriotic Alliance1 49215.3%
Kannaland Independent PartyKannaland Independent Party9719.9%
ANCAfrican National Congress8318.5%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus4564.7%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement4414.5%
IndependentIndependent candidates3343.4%
BOSABuild One South Africa1141.2%
AGMAhgaman920.9%
GOOD380.4%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters340.3%
CCCNational Coloured Congress150.2%
CAPEXITCape Independence Party / Kaapse Onafhanklikheids Party110.1%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement100.1%

Council seats · 10 ?

Independent Civic Organisation of South Africa2 ward · 1 PR3
Democratic Alliance2 ward · 1 PR3
Patriotic Alliance1 ward · 1 PR2
African National Congress0 ward · 1 PR1
Kannaland Independent Party0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Kannaland ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 2, Kannaland in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 5

On EskomSePush

KannalandPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 138 · All 14 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 14 voting districts here (9 729 of 16 376). The IEC publishes 60.2%.

Note: ward 1: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 747 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 517 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1498); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 455 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1399); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (905); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2023: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 779 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 320 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1091); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (516); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (680); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2023: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 571 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1778); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 453 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1413); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 412 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (675); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2023: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 693 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2424); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (856); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (454); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2023: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 465 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1643); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 428 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (703); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (540); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (550); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (475); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2023: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 08:08 SAST.