Knysna

special votes 2 340 · All 30 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 30 voting districts here (30 062 of 48 955). The IEC publishes 61.8%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1592 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4999); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 728 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2089); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 380 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (804); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2109: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1474: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2013 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 450 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1078); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (400); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2109: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1474: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1018 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3018); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 606 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1815); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 519 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1619); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (737); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2109: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1474: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1077 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3099); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 837 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2419); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2109: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1474: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1643 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 399 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2109: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1474: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 725 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 408 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (816); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (801); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (459); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2109: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1474: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1021 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3010); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 363 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (752); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2109: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1474: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3833); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 475 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1442); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (878); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (836); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2109: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1474: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2523 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7792); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2109: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (452); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1474: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2872 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 273 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (850); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2109: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1474: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 773 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2466); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 448 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1362); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (434); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2109: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1474: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:31 SAST.