Langeberg

special votes 1 552 · All 36 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 36 voting districts here (25 451 of 48 560). The IEC publishes 52.9%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 999 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (797); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1876: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1090 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3349); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (567); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1876: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1989: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 947 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2830); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 493 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1452); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 373 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1053); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1876: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1989: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 825 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2453); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 672 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2051); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 663 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1994); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1876: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 747 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 453 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1354); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (568); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1876: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1989: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 824 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2616); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 466 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1392); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (604); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (561); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1876: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1345 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (690); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (658); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1876: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1989: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 805 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2678); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (792); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (670); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1989: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1876: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 698 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 635 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1911); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 264 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (859); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (612); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (450); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1876: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1989: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1989: the IEC's cross-ballot total 863 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1748); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 585 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1876: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (562); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (459); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1458 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4524); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 490 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1989: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 912 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2781); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (958); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (719); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1989: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1876: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 17:09 SAST.