WardsDA 6PA 2darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2006 Ward 6 (2006 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

DA 6 of 15 seats · 8 for a majority

Most ward votes: DA 42.0%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

MatzikamaAll 30 voting districts in

All 8 wards complete

Turnout50.3%

Voters on the roll36 342

South Africa · Counting22 349 of 23 696 voting districts in (94.3%)

checked 20:40Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 18 125 valid votes

DADemocratic Alliance7 62042.0%
PAPatriotic Alliance4 50424.8%
ANCAfrican National Congress3 14017.3%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 2546.9%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters4902.7%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party2301.3%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania1690.9%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change1580.9%
CCCNational Coloured Congress1460.8%
UDUnited Democrats860.5%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party800.4%
SACPSouth African Communist Party630.3%
GOOD520.3%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement510.3%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement330.2%
CAPEXITCape Independence Party / Kaapse Onafhanklikheids Party240.1%
IndependentIndependent candidates200.1%
KSHPKhoi-San Heavenly Party50.0%

Council seats · 15 ?

Democratic Alliance6 ward · 0 PR6
Patriotic Alliance2 ward · 2 PR4
African National Congress0 ward · 3 PR3
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Matzikama ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power129hours off12 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet8hours off1 outage

2006 Ward 6, Matzikama in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 8

On EskomSePush

MatzikamaPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 198 · All 30 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 30 voting districts here (18 264 of 36 342). The IEC publishes 50.4%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 811 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 728 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 380 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 283 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (717); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (520); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1068: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1326 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4031); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 599 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1756); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (645); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1303: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1068: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 816 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 620 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1906); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 544 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1656); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1068: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1303: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 736 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 681 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 343 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1044); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (411); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1303: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1068: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3718); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (895); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (835); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 922 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2716); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 918 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2550); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 327 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3550); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 511 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1578); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 489 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1527); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (525); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1068: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1303: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 636 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1969); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 553 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1658); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 410 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1303: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1068: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 08:50 SAST.