Mossel Bay

special votes 3 926 · All 37 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 37 voting districts here (48 275 of 79 938). The IEC publishes 60.7%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3622); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 490 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (715); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (447); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 751 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 637 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1977); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 831 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 432 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 398 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2719 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 479 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1429); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2519 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7553); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1409); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 401 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3364 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 646 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2009); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2838 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8540); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 492 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1421); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3474); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1088 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 604 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1899); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2936 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8825); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 485 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 862 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2598); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 545 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1630); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 432 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (260); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3833); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 660 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2020); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3628); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 907 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 279 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (846); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 940 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2839); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 498 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (785); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3528 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10567); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 676 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1967); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 929 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2708); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:08 SAST.