Oudtshoorn

special votes 3 129 · All 39 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 39 voting districts here (26 619 of 56 473). The IEC publishes 47.3%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 476 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1508); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (960); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (596); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1597: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1933: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2101: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3224: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1595 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5044); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 833 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2265); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2101: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1933: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1597: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3224: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3877); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 714 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2010); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1933: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1597: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2101: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3224: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 625 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1948); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 495 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2101: the IEC's cross-ballot total 215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (417); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3224: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1933: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1597: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 583 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1819); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 548 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1737); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 477 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1484); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (662); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1933: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1597: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2101: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3224: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 779 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 369 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1933: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1597: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3224: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2101: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1622 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4836); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 371 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (774); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (465); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1933: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1597: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2101: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3224: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 588 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1836); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 424 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2101: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (483); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (738); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3224: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1933: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1597: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 435 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 418 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 391 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (977); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (546); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1933: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2101: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1597: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3224: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 763 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (775); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (781); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (449); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2101: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1597: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1522: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3224: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 450 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1512); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 400 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 340 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (658); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (688); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2101: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1597: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1933: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 572 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1752); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (665); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (429); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1933: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2101: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1597: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2140: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3224: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 767 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2410); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 575 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1735); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 551 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1626); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1933: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1597: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2101: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1582: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2094: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1624: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3224: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 609: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:31 SAST.