Overstrand

special votes 4 378 · All 37 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 37 voting districts here (43 543 of 70 050). The IEC publishes 62.5%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1405 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 412 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (471); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 642 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1927); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 457 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (962); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (787); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3236: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2790 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8797); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 320 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (450); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (971); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3236: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2480 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7511); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 518 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1521); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (493); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3236: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1005 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 431 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (701); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3636); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 955 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2861); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (782); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3236: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2841 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8754); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1613); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3236: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1508 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4560); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 412 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (556); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3236: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1484 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4452); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 303 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (903); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (604); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3236: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2502 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7557); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 515 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 260 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (751); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3236: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6874); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 521 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3236: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1554 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4643); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 369 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9780); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 381 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6435); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 422 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 321 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (922); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3236: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2463 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 465 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3236: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 10:05 SAST.