Saldanha Bay

special votes 8 090 · All 26 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 26 voting districts here (42 266 of 76 103). The IEC publishes 55.7%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1074 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 775 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 569 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1734); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 533 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1615); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1021: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 850 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2964); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 613 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2027); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (762); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1136: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 869 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2585); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 621 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1863); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (595); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1136: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1021: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3842); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 525 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1557); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 515 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1560); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1136: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1021: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6605); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 305 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (929); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (536); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1021: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1136: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1702 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (936); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1021: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1040 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1346); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (746); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (713); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (686); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1136: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1850 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 341 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1016); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (857); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (804); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1021: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 543 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1621); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 434 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (796); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (519); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (438); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1021: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1136: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6546); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 500 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1503); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (705); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1021: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1136: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2565 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7694); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 312 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1030); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (752); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1136: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1021: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 722 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2026); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 650 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1902); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 591 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1789); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 378 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (609); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1136: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3475); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1049 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1136: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2435 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7453); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 331 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1046); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (803); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1021: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2006 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6096); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (697); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1021: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 912 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2710); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 568 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1728); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (927); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1360: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1136: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:31 SAST.