Stellenbosch

special votes 4 552 · All 50 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 50 voting districts here (55 232 of 106 255). The IEC publishes 52.3%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1485 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4449); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 419 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (480); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3471); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 695 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 520 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1572); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1009 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3066); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 317 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (938); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 280 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (876); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1507 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4684); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 510 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 414 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (781); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 403 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (464); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6841); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (676); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (500); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1478 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4462); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1371 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4085); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (464); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2728 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (598); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (421); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1431 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4341); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1704 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (656); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (487); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 546 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1629); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (468); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 919 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1820); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (564); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1007 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3067); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 353 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1028); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (547); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 914 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2740); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 472 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (547); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1032 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (598); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (484); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2434 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (440); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (401); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1478 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4260); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 355 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (624); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (506); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2007 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 463 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (559); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2089 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (432); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2933 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (840); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (785); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1637 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4943); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (467); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3550); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (618); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (260); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 14:31 SAST.