WardsDA 10ANC 1PA 1darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2000 Ward 6 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

DA majority

14 of 23 seats

Most ward votes: DA 60.2%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

SwartlandAll 39 voting districts in

All 12 wards complete

Turnout52.5%

Voters on the roll58 703

South Africa · Counting23 062 of 23 696 voting districts in (97.3%)

checked 01:11Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 30 361 valid votes

DADemocratic Alliance18 28560.2%
PAPatriotic Alliance4 90916.2%
ANCAfrican National Congress3 48911.5%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus2 0686.8%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters4731.6%
SACPSouth African Communist Party3121.0%
GOOD2120.7%
CCCNational Coloured Congress2100.7%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement1070.4%
CAPEXITCape Independence Party / Kaapse Onafhanklikheids Party900.3%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change830.3%
IndependentIndependent candidates570.2%
UIMUnited Independent Movement400.1%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement260.1%

Council seats · 23 ?

Democratic Alliance10 ward · 4 PR14
Patriotic Alliance1 ward · 3 PR4
African National Congress1 ward · 2 PR3
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 2 PR2

Hours off in Swartland ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power264hours off27 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet53hours off6 outages

2000 Ward 6, Swartland in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 12

On EskomSePush

SwartlandPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 2 142 · All 39 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 39 voting districts here (30 817 of 58 703). The IEC publishes 52.6%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1410 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 508 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1417); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (704); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1023 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 388 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 337 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1004); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (581); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3556); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 434 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (489); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (403); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 992 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 680 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1932); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (839); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (569); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (574); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2945 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8769); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 273 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (892); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (596); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4033); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (964); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (691); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3599); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 562 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1689); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 294 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (876); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2281 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6788); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 327 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1001); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1339 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3991); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (683); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2981 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8961); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 327 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (929); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1405 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1380 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (944); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (561); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1638: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:31 SAST.