WardsDA 3ANC 2PA 1darker = bigger win

Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the PR ballot per ward

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC and DA 4 seats each of 11 · 6 for a majority

Most party (PR) votes: DA 39.8% · down 12.5 pts from 52.3% in 2021

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

SwellendamAll 16 voting districts in

All 6 wards complete

Turnout55.7%

Voters on the roll23 937

South Africa · Counting22 823 of 23 696 voting districts in (96.3%)

checked 23:16Latest results

PR ballot ? · 13 190 valid votes

DADemocratic Alliance5 25239.8%
ANCAfrican National Congress4 38033.2%
PAPatriotic Alliance2 84621.6%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus5654.3%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters550.4%
CAPEXITCape Independence Party / Kaapse Onafhanklikheids Party230.2%
SACPSouth African Communist Party220.2%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party180.1%
SAFSouth Africa First160.1%
CCCNational Coloured Congress130.1%

Council seats · 11 ?

African National Congress2 ward · 2 PR4
Democratic Alliance3 ward · 1 PR4
Patriotic Alliance1 ward · 1 PR2
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Swellendam ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power115hours off15 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet21hours off2 outages

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

SwellendamPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 971 · All 16 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 16 voting districts here (13 322 of 23 937). The IEC publishes 56.0%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1523 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4519); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (890); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 886 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2668); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 935 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2819); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 687 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2065); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 478 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1475); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1498 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4530); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 655 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1969); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 592 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1766); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (357); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3827); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 441 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1317); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 743 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 452 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (739); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:31 SAST.