Theewaterskloof

special votes 3 193 · All 49 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 49 voting districts here (31 634 of 65 995). The IEC publishes 48.0%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 939 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2847); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 838 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 686 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2015); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1461 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4389); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 370 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (922); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1930 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5942); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (961); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (682); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 862 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2571); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 720 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (718); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 937 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2993); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 721 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 453 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (637); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (493); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (469); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 419 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1426); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 355 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (953); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (464); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (506); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 900 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2809); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 468 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 443 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 406 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (602); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (389); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3484); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 369 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 851 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2617); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1040); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (737); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 946 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2817); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (759); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 878 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2603); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 861 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2596); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 898 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2712); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 317 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (992); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (598); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 995 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2942); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (922); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (785); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (345); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (789); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1843: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1898: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1352: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 20:09 SAST.