Witzenberg

special votes 890 · All 41 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 41 voting districts here (25 268 of 53 234). The IEC publishes 47.6%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (588); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 940 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2802); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 459 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (901); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (495); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3973); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 335 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (981); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1025 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 361 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1063); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (539); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1554 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4705); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (520); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (506); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (410); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 755 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 494 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1394); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (919); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (563); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3371); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 756 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (796); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (603); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 546 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1679); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 511 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 486 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1483); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 452 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 629 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1933); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 575 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1729); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (847); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (597); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1050 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 917 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2767); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 430 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (639); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (616); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2142: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 593 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1783); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 588 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1742); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 45: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1057: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1585: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 321: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1962: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1395: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 467: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2132: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 84: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 593: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1044: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 10:48 SAST.