Amahlathi

special votes 2 795 · All 92 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 92 voting districts here (24 983 of 50 308). The IEC publishes 49.7%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 917 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2725); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (872); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 928 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2779); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (716); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 933 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2824); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1030 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3071); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 407 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1072 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (821); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (737); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1435 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (586); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (471); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3587); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 217 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3683); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 594 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1754); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1687 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5000); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (506); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1540: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3276: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 877 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2620); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (843); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 923 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2767); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (804); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (529); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1530 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 260 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (737); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1902: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 962 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 667 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1940); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (312); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (638); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 325 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (836); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (484); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1572: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 19:51 SAST.