Blue Crane Route

Ward 1: 4 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 65.6% so farWard 2: not in yetWard 3: 1 of 2 voting districts in, ANC 61.1% so farWard 4: 4 of 6 voting districts in, DA 68.1% so farWard 5: not in yetWard 6: DA 51.1%
WardsANC 2DA 2Partly counted 3No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

ANC 46.3%

Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · Ward ballot
  • ANC 46.3%
  • DA 38.7%
  • PA 8.3%
  • Others 6.6%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 911 of 23 696 voting districts in (8.1%)checked Latest results
Blue Crane Route22 of 29 voting districts in1 of 6 wards complete
Turnout so far52.2%
Voters on the roll so far9 028

Ward ballot ? · 4 647 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Blue Crane Route vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Blue Crane Route ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water12hours off1 outage
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug · Water: 12 hours offAug: 12 hours off12AugSep: 0 hours off0SepOct: 0 hours off0Oct

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 357 · 22 of 29 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 22 voting districts with results so far here (3 991 of 7 640). The IEC publishes 51.6%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 442 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (632); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 530 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1563); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (654); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 975 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2868); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 735 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 04:17 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it