Blue Crane Route

Get the app
Ward 1: ANC 60.7%Ward 2: DA 43.4%Ward 3: ANC 60.4%Ward 4: DA 53.3%Ward 5: DA 43.7%Ward 6: DA 51.1%
WardsDA 4ANC 2darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2016 Ward 6 (2016 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

No majority

ANC 5 of 11 seats · 6 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 44.9%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Blue Crane RouteAll 29 voting districts in
All 6 wards complete
Turnout53.2%
Voters on the roll19 333
South Africa · Counting22 670 of 23 696 voting districts in (95.7%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 10 181 valid votes

Council seats · 11 ?

  1. African National Congress2 ward · 3 PR5
  2. Democratic Alliance4 ward · 0 PR4
  3. Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
  4. Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Blue Crane Route ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water12hours off1 outage
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug · Water: 12 hours offAug: 12 hours off12AugSep: 0 hours off0SepOct: 0 hours off0Oct

2016 Ward 6, Blue Crane Route in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 762 · All 29 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 29 voting districts here (10 286 of 19 333). The IEC publishes 53.2%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 752 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (777); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 650 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1966); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 643 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1973); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1062 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 529 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1569); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1040 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3082); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 827 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2488); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 799 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 557 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1687); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 975 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2868); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 735 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 06:20 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it