ANC 42.2%
Most ward votes
- ANC 42.2%
- DA 17.3%
- UDM 16.3%
- Others 24.2%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Every voting district is in. The IEC hasn't calculated the council's seats yet: they appear here when it does.
Ward ballot ? · 248 662 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress104 90342.2%
DADemocratic Alliance42 90917.3%
UDMUnited Democratic Movement40 64316.3%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters17 6297.1%- SACPSouth African Communist Party11 8564.8%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement5 3612.2%
ActionSA4 3871.8%
PAPatriotic Alliance4 2991.7%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus3 1421.3%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party2 8771.2%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania1 7450.7%
AICAfrican Independent Congress1 5350.6%- SMSocial Democratic Movement1 0050.4%
- TBMThina Bantu Movement9940.4%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party9710.4%
RISERise Mzansi8740.4%
AHCAfrican Heart Congress6720.3%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah4670.2%- IndependentIndependent candidates4210.2%
COPECongress of the People3550.1%
APCAfrican People's Convention3490.1%
AUCAfrican Unemployed Congress3320.1%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement2500.1%
- OLAOne Love Alliance2220.1%
- PCMProgressive Community Movement2030.1%
- SDPService Delivery Party950.0%
ARECOArusha Economic Coalition810.0%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party450.0%- ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation230.0%
- AMC.ROY.African Movement Congress170.0%
Hours off in Buffalo City ?
Reported in the ESP app
2011 Ward 35, Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 50
- Ward 1ANC 39.3%
- Ward 2ANC 51.8%
- Ward 3UDM 27.8%
- Ward 4DA 51.3%
- Ward 5UDM 49.1%
- Ward 6ANC 48.9%
- Ward 7ANC 46.7%
- Ward 8ANC 28.4%
- Ward 9ANC 29.0%
- Ward 10ANC 37.9%
- Ward 11ANC 70.0%
- Ward 12ANC 45.2%
- Ward 13ANC 54.8%
- Ward 14ANC 67.9%
- Ward 16DA 43.5%
- Ward 17ANC 60.3%
- Ward 18DA 80.7%
- Ward 19DA 54.2%
- Ward 20ANC 51.6%
- Ward 21ANC 45.9%
- Ward 22ANC 50.3%
- Ward 23ANC 61.9%
- Ward 24ANC 52.3%
- Ward 25ANC 46.3%
- Ward 26ANC 61.2%
- Ward 27UDM 43.2%
- Ward 28DA 71.4%
- Ward 29DA 71.3%
- Ward 30ANC 57.3%
- Ward 31ANC 44.3%
- Ward 32ANC 63.5%
- Ward 33ANC 56.0%
- Ward 34ANC 60.5%
- Ward 35ANC 55.0%
- Ward 36ANC 59.3%
- Ward 37ANC 36.8%
- Ward 38ANC 69.4%
- Ward 39ANC 55.0%
- Ward 40ANC 47.1%
- Ward 41SACP 49.0%
- Ward 42ANC 54.6%
- Ward 43ANC 45.1%
- Ward 44ANC 35.5%
- Ward 45ANC 48.8%
- Ward 46ANC 29.6%
- Ward 47EFF 30.9%
- Ward 48ANC 50.3%
- Ward 49ANC 76.1%
- Ward 50ANC 37.5%
- Ward 15Tied
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 39 260 · All 380 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 380 voting districts here (253 340 of 458 695). The IEC publishes 55.6%.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4637); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1464 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2883); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2545); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 427 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (828); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4357); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1747 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3518); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2533); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 990 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1846); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 933 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1735); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 573 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1136); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (260); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3049 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5953); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2329); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 929 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1917); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2432 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4794); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1532 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3174); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 350 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (585); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (377); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1994 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3765); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 941 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1830); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 452 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (942); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 268 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (442); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (459); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2740 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5546); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2387 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4796); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (490); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (346); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1341 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2732); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 980 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2059); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 910 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1825); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 680 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1340); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (553); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (323); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2776); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1365 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2828); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1052 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2053); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (488); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2640 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5260); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1801 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3637); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1009 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2010); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 708 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1422); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (648); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3060 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5748); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 571 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1056); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (294); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (269); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (678); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2047 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4081); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1711 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3474); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (445); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4500); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 730 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1006); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 369 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (603); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1160); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6004); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 496 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (816); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (457); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1182); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1714 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3382); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1714 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3307); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1692 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3463); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 868 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1844); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1481 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2896); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 963 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1927); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 421 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (951); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (434); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2777 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5430); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 945 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1984); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 391 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (776); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4936 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9689); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 305 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (633); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (599); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4565); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 700 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1364); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 512 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1027); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 311 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (702); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2063 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4114); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2371); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4576); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2354); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 739 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1328); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 262 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (504); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2455 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4925); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 605 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1100); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 595 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1098); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 384 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (683); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 363 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (582); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (546); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2683 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5248); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 850 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1798); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (458); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2502 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5046); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 661 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1297); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 502 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1149); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (783); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4563); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1509 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2986); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (635); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (561); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6441); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 808 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1546); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (831); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (635); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (498); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2026 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4089); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2283); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2135); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4526 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8789); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 520 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1078); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 421 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1025); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (576); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3769 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7398); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 571 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1114); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 363 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (730); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 279 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (665); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2814 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5451); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1031 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1579); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1771); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2551 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5009); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2578); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 733 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1525); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 552 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1029); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3693 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7413); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 752 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1507); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 704 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1419); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (471); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2581 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 930 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1835); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 477 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (912); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (385); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5963); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1344 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2476); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5032); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1052 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1130); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (341); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (335); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (308); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (303); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1383); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2909 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5841); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 683 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1442); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 551 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1061); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (312); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1843 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3636); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2862); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 906 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1768); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (499); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6478); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 461 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (906); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (689); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6211); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 869 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1577); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 481 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1054); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 402 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (827); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (574); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 39: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1960 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4040); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 980 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1975); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 500 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (867); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (506); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (470); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2071 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3759); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1438 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3041); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (689); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 41: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2332 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4658); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2627); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (539); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 42: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2073 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2238); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 456 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1150); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 287 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (538); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (494); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 43: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1948 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3886); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 918 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1815); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 869 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1705); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 724 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1370); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 381 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (743); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (613); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 44: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4660); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2342); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 419 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (898); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 217 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (371); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 45: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1769 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3600); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1062 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2232); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 872 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1713); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 787 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1747); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 601 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1208); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 46: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1310 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2549); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 972 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 772 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1510); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 483 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (912); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (383); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 47: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1856 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3662); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2527); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (455); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 48: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6369); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 435 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (844); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 315 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (670); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 49: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1923 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3860); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1478 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2884); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2346); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 50: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 18:49 SAST.