Ward 4

Get the app
Voting district 10090044: DA 63.9% (PR ballot)Voting district 10090066: DA 38.4% (PR ballot)Voting district 10090101: DA 51.2% (PR ballot)Midlands College(Woeke Street Campus) (VD 10090044)Spandau Public High School (VD 10090066)Alex Laing Hall (VD 10090101)
Voting districtsDA 3darker = bigger win
Dots: voting stations
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

DA 48.9%up 5.5 pts from 43.4% in 2021

Democratic Alliance · won the ward ballot

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

This wardAll 3 voting districts in
Turnout51.0%
Voters on the roll3 732
South Africa · Counting20 005 of 23 696 voting districts in (84.4%)
checked Latest results

Elected ward councillor ?

Joy Juanita WilliamsDemocratic Alliance

Ward ballot ? · 1 918 valid votes

Hours off in Ward 4 ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power12hours off1 outage
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May · Power: 12 hours offMay: 12 hours off12MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug: 0 hours off0AugSep: 0 hours off0SepOct: 0 hours off0Oct

Voting districts · 3 ?

Candidates · 10

  • Hester Uchella Meita MackelinaAction Save-Bnm
  • Krisjan NofemelaAfrican National Congress
  • Usisipho Junior MrwebiAfrika Mayibuye Movement
  • Joy Juanita WilliamsDemocratic Alliance
  • Sizwe GrootboomEconomic Freedom Fighters
  • Violet Winnie KockPatriotic Alliance
  • Johannes OlifantSouth African Communist Party
  • Lorenda Lucretia AdamsUmkhonto Wesizwe Party
  • Klaas Jacob FransUnited Democratic Movement
  • Ayrton Vi-Valdo TravillVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus

Source: IEC certified candidate list (PDF, 16 Sept 2026)

This ward in earlier elections ?

Boundaries changed after 2021: each ward's own results, never re-allocated.

ESP areas in this ward · 3 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 1 963 · spoilt 45 · special votes 243 · All 3 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

PR ballot figures for this ward are the sum of the IEC's results for its 3 voting districts; the IEC publishes the ward ballot per ward and the PR ballot per voting district.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 3 voting districts here (1 905 of 3 732). The IEC publishes 52.6%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same ward (the ward that covered the same area then), both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 937 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2762); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 436 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1025); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2021: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090044: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1005); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090044: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090044: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090044: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090044: party 2021: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090044: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090044: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090044: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090044: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090044: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090044: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090044: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090044: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090044: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090044: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090044: party 2123: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090066: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 329 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1028); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090066: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 253 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (768); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090066: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (620); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090066: party 2021: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090066: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090066: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090066: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090066: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090066: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090066: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090066: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090066: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090066: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090066: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090101: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (729); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090101: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090101: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090101: party 2021: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090101: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090101: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090101: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090101: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090101: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090101: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 10090101: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Dr. Beyers Naude's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 13:49 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it