Elundini

Ward 1: 2 of 10 voting districts in, ANC 65.2% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 2: not in yetWard 3: 3 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 73.1% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 4: not in yetWard 5: 1 of 11 voting districts in, ANC 66.4% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 6: 1 of 16 voting districts in, ANC 66.9% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 7: 2 of 15 voting districts in, ANC 41.0% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 8: 2 of 12 voting districts in, ANC 43.7% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 9: not in yetWard 10: 2 of 11 voting districts in, ANC 46.6% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 11: not in yetWard 12: not in yetWard 13: not in yetWard 14: 1 of 12 voting districts in, ATM 36.0% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 15: 1 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 91.1% so far (Ward ballot)Ward 16: no votes on this ballotWard 17: 3 of 9 voting districts in, DA 53.1% so far (Ward ballot)
WardsANC 8ATM 1DA 1Partly counted 10No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the DC 40% ballot per ward
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

ANC 67.5%

Leading on the DC 40% ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · DC 40% ballot
  • ANC 67.5%
  • ATM 8.2%
  • DA 7.8%
  • Others 16.6%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting717 of 23 696 voting districts in (3.0%)checked Latest results
Elundini18 of 166 voting districts in0 of 17 wards complete
Turnout so far43.8%
Voters on the roll so far4 646

DC 40% ballot ? · 1 727 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Elundini vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Elundini ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power24hours off2 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May · Power: 16 hours offMay: 16 hours off16MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug: 0 hours off0AugSep: 0 hours off0SepOct · Power: 8 hours offOct: 8 hours off8Oct

Wards · 17

On EskomSePush

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 206 · 19 of 166 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 19 voting districts with results so far here (2 035 of 4 646). The IEC publishes 44.1%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 539 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1521); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 02:02 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it